<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GNOME Shell Status &#8211; 2008-11-23</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fishsoup.net/2008/11/22/gnome-shell-status/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fishsoup.net/2008/11/22/gnome-shell-status/</link>
	<description>Owen Taylor on Coding, Food, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 23:41:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonim</title>
		<link>http://blog.fishsoup.net/2008/11/22/gnome-shell-status/#comment-1790</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 13:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owtaylor.wordpress.com/?p=78#comment-1790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any further updates?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any further updates?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snuxoll</title>
		<link>http://blog.fishsoup.net/2008/11/22/gnome-shell-status/#comment-1788</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[snuxoll]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owtaylor.wordpress.com/?p=78#comment-1788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Mackenzie Docks do not have inherint usability issues, to be honest I&#039;d say Windows 7 of all things proves this.  In fact, if we could somehow implement something similar I&#039;d be all for it.

In general regards to this post, I&#039;m not a big fan of the shell.  First and foremost it brings back bad memories of explorer.exe, I&#039;m not a big fan of my entire desktop going down because one process is trying to do it all.  I&#039;m also not a big fan of these new UI concepts, I think they are un-gnome-like and it&#039;s going against the grain for little to no benefit.  I don&#039;t see how you can implement window managment with such a convoluted UI, and I don&#039;t get why you&#039;re essentially building all of this into metacity instead of supporting the compiz project (which you are effectively killing off with this) and just building a better panel and desktop.

I fear what GNOME is about to become, and unless I see some better demos for the shell I&#039;m finding it hard to keep my enthusiasm for GNOME 3.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mackenzie Docks do not have inherint usability issues, to be honest I&#8217;d say Windows 7 of all things proves this.  In fact, if we could somehow implement something similar I&#8217;d be all for it.</p>
<p>In general regards to this post, I&#8217;m not a big fan of the shell.  First and foremost it brings back bad memories of explorer.exe, I&#8217;m not a big fan of my entire desktop going down because one process is trying to do it all.  I&#8217;m also not a big fan of these new UI concepts, I think they are un-gnome-like and it&#8217;s going against the grain for little to no benefit.  I don&#8217;t see how you can implement window managment with such a convoluted UI, and I don&#8217;t get why you&#8217;re essentially building all of this into metacity instead of supporting the compiz project (which you are effectively killing off with this) and just building a better panel and desktop.</p>
<p>I fear what GNOME is about to become, and unless I see some better demos for the shell I&#8217;m finding it hard to keep my enthusiasm for GNOME 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://blog.fishsoup.net/2008/11/22/gnome-shell-status/#comment-1778</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[George]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 16:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owtaylor.wordpress.com/?p=78#comment-1778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow!  Wanda lives!  This is apparently my most enduring contribution to GNOME!

BTW, the rest looks very cool too.  I&#039;m glad that that horrible panel is going to be gone.  That guy who maintained it for the first few years of GNOME was a hack.

George]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  Wanda lives!  This is apparently my most enduring contribution to GNOME!</p>
<p>BTW, the rest looks very cool too.  I&#8217;m glad that that horrible panel is going to be gone.  That guy who maintained it for the first few years of GNOME was a hack.</p>
<p>George</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanieleDM</title>
		<link>http://blog.fishsoup.net/2008/11/22/gnome-shell-status/#comment-1774</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DanieleDM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owtaylor.wordpress.com/?p=78#comment-1774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[cite: 
One thing we have discussed is moving the background drawing to the shell and making the file manager window a big ARGB window with a transparent background.

that will be lovely, keep the good work ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cite:<br />
One thing we have discussed is moving the background drawing to the shell and making the file manager window a big ARGB window with a transparent background.</p>
<p>that will be lovely, keep the good work <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vadim P.</title>
		<link>http://blog.fishsoup.net/2008/11/22/gnome-shell-status/#comment-1764</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vadim P.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owtaylor.wordpress.com/?p=78#comment-1764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Mackenzie: While I&#039;d agree that is the case for Cairo-Dock or whatever else, my AWN only bounced icons when attention is needed - so selecting a window is a snap and easy to do.

Plus, icons with tooltip text is way better than icons + text.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mackenzie: While I&#8217;d agree that is the case for Cairo-Dock or whatever else, my AWN only bounced icons when attention is needed &#8211; so selecting a window is a snap and easy to do.</p>
<p>Plus, icons with tooltip text is way better than icons + text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen</title>
		<link>http://blog.fishsoup.net/2008/11/22/gnome-shell-status/#comment-1763</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Owen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owtaylor.wordpress.com/?p=78#comment-1763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please note: 

 http://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell

Has links to the mailing list and IRC channel for gnome-shell. Those are generally better places than comments here for extensive discussion and for getting help with building gnome-shell.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please note: </p>
<p> <a href="http://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell" rel="nofollow">http://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell</a></p>
<p>Has links to the mailing list and IRC channel for gnome-shell. Those are generally better places than comments here for extensive discussion and for getting help with building gnome-shell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

